Home » Archive

Articles Archive for October 2008

Foreclosure news, Media & Politics »

[30 Oct 2008 | One Comment | 31 views]
Foreclosure calculation errors or bad reporting?

With the latest third-quarter figures still in the news, now is a good time for some further scrutinization. Strategically and purposefully, it seems that foreclosure listings companies offer their statistics in varying forms as not to draw any obvious attention to the disparities afflicting the data.
The most recent reports do just that.  An article published on October 10, 2008 in the South Florida Business Journal, uses ForeclosureS.com reported numbers for Florida during the period of September, 2008. The article, titled, “Florida ranks No. 3 for foreclosures,” stated there were …

ForeclosureS.com »

[23 Oct 2008 | No Comment | 22 views]

Third quarter numbers have been released to the press with yet again many articles offering more conflicting numbers. Depending on the source of the foreclosure data, most likely readers will see a variety of figures reflecting the current state of the foreclosure market.

The first of these articles comes from CNNMoney.com titled, “81,312 homes lost to foreclosure in September.” The article published on October 23, 2008 by Catherine Clifford offers figures from Realty Trac, an Irvine, CA based listing company.

As stated in the headline, there were 81,312 foreclosures during the …

Foreclosure news, ForeclosureRadar.com »

[16 Oct 2008 | One Comment | 25 views]

Foreclosure statistics have again sprung up across all media outlets. However, unlike recent trends, the headlines for California are claiming dramatic foreclosure declines. Imagine, in a time with economic strain taking precedence in the media, comes an article with a slight glimmer of hope? But is it based on fact?
According to reports from Foreclosure Radar, California foreclosure notices in September dropped significantly compared to rates in August. The statistic comes from one of several articles on the subject, this one titled, “State foreclosures fall dramatically.” The article quotes …

REOSphere.com »

[9 Oct 2008 | One Comment | 26 views]

Over the last few months Foreclosure Research has provided several articles pointing out the discrepancies in reporting for different foreclosure companies. The discrepancies are most likely due to the fact that foreclosure information is spread out across all platforms and is truly illusive in nature.
The reality is, foreclosures are so hard to track that some foreclosure listing companies are even using their competitor’s data for uses in press release articles. Take REOSphere for example. REOSphere is based in Minnesota and provides REO listings for the St. Paul and Minneapolis …

RealtyTrac »

[3 Oct 2008 | 2 Comments | 85 views]

With the recent revelation coming from Realty Trac’s reporting process, Foreclosure Research has come across some interesting findings.
Referring back to the article, “How many foreclosures? ‘We know we’re underreporting West Virginia,’” Rick Sharga provided the following insight, “West Virginia is one of the states where we need to do a better job.”  He continued by stating, “We know we’re under reporting in West Virginia,” and that, “we concentrate on areas of 25,000 people or more.”
The article also touched upon the fact that Realty Trac stated West Virginia had a very …